How BallMoney.ai works

BallMoney.ai records attributable, hash-chained audit events for governed system actions and reviewer decisions.

Every governed action writes an audit row whose SHA-256 hash includes the previous row's hash, so removing or editing history is detectable. A verification routine walks the chain and reports the first broken sequence.

High-risk outputs can require human review before an athlete acts on them.

A deterministic rules layer assigns each analysis a review level from optional through blocked-pending-review. Blocked items cannot produce an approved communication until a reviewer records a disposition.

Recommendations display confidence, provenance, and supporting evidence.

Each recommendation surfaces its confidence status, the policy snapshot it was decided under, the retrieval trace for any prior-negotiation memory used, and the model used at each stage.

Scores and risk flags are computed by deterministic rules, not generated by a language model.

Numeric scores, boundary checks, cash projections and obligation dates come from pure functions with no model call. Language models are used only to explain results that were already computed.

Athlete documents are private by default and are released only through explicit, revocable grants that are logged.

Media lives in a private storage bucket. Access requires an active grant; signed URLs are minted per request after a live grant check, and every mint, download attempt and denial is written to a hash-chained access log. Revoking a grant or a share link stops access immediately.

BallMoney.ai is a decision-support tool. It does not represent athletes in a legal agency capacity. Contract execution is performed by independent licensed agents and attorneys in our Certified Review Network.

Stated in the Terms of Service, the Disclaimer, and the shared legal copy component rendered across the product.

Athletes keep control: you decide what is analyzed, what is shared, and who sees it.

Every vault section carries an explicit privacy state; sharing is grant-based and revocable; preference boundaries can hold or block a deal before any recommendation is produced.